Skip to main content

Table 4 Regression Analysis of PTOPS scores on baseline socio-demographic and healthcare variables (n = 131)

From: Patient Satisfaction with private Physiotherapy for musculoskeletal Pain

Enhancer

Overall Model

 

r2

F value

P value

    
  

0.040

5.334

0.022

    

Predictor Variables

Injury Site

Age

First time to attend PT*

No. of PT sessions

Gender

Marital Status

Profession/Degree

GP referral to PT

Beta

0.200

-0.022

-0.102

0.155

-0.047

-0.116

-0.041

0.031

t-value

2.314

-0.243

-1.182

1.784

-0.540

-1.340

-0.467

0.354

significance

0.022

0.808

0.240

0.077

0.590

0.183

0.641

0.724

Detractor

Overall Model

 

r 2

F value

P value

    
  

0.096

13.568

<0.001

    

Predictor Variables

Injury Site

Age

First time to attend PT*

Number of PT sessions

Gender

Marital Status

Profession/Degree

GP referral to PT

Beta

-0.063

-0.310

0.110

-0.044

0.147

0.131

-0.093

-0.036

t-value

-0.718

-3.683

1.311

-0.517

1.707

1.415

-1.102

-0.425

significance

0.474

<0.001

0.192

0.606

0.090

0.159

0.273

0.671

Location

Overall Model

 

r 2

F value

P value

    
  

0.096

13.568

<0.001

    

Predictor Variables

Injury Site

Age

First time to attend PT*

Number of PT sessions

Gender

Marital Status

Profession/Degree

GP referral to PT

Beta

0.123

-0.034

-0.079

0.111

0.109

0.053

0.170

-0.057

t-value

1.307

-0.323

-0.872

1.222

1.142

0.537

1.839

-0.622

significance

0.194

0.747

0.385

0.224

0.256

0.592

0.068

0.535

Cost

Overall Model

 

r 2

F value

P value

    
  

0.055

0.872

0.542

    

Predictor Variables

Injury Site

Age

First time to attend PT*

Number of PT sessions

Gender

Marital Status

Profession/Degree

GP referral to PT

Beta

-0.048

-0.078

0.064

-0.013

0.111

0.129

0.149

-0.059

t-value

-0.502

-0.724

0.687

-0.143

1.140

1.279

1.584

-0.637

significance

0.617

0.470

0.494

0.886

0.256

0.203

0.116

0.525

  1. * PT = Physiotherapy