Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of different genetic model comparison results

From: Associations of LBX1 gene and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis susceptibility: a meta-analysis based on 34,626 subjects

SNP

Genetic model

OR (95 % CI)

Z

P value

I2%

P het

Effect model

Egger’s test

t value

P value

rs111090870

TT + TC vs. CC

1.12 (1.09–1.15)

7.66

0.000

68.8

<0.001

R

0.42

0.684

TT vs. TC + CC

1.42 (1.36–1.49)

15.49

0.000

42.6

0.058

F

0.92

0.378

TT vs. CC

1.36 (1.27–1.45)

9.07

0.000

73.2

<0.001

R

0.98

0.349

TC vs. CC

1.13 (1.09–1.18)

5.92

0.000

56.3

0.009

R

−0.07

0.949

T vs. C

1.21 (1.16–1.26)

9.52

0.000

68.7

<0.001

R

0.55

0.597

rs678741

GG + GA vs. AA

0.79 (0.77–9.82)

16.79

0.000

0.0

0.998

F

0.85

0.458

GG vs. GA + AA

0.69 (0.64–0.74)

10.98

0.000

0.0

0.880

F

−0.82

0.470

GG vs. AA

0.68 (0.65–0.72)

13.22

0.000

0.0

0.517

F

−1.09

0.356

GA vs. AA

0.88 (0.85–0.91)

8.12

0.000

0.0

0.904

F

−0.73

0.519

G vs. A

0.83 (0.81–0.85)

13.75

0.000

0.0

0.743

F

−0.69

0.542

rs11598564

GG + GA vs. AA

1.13 (1.10–1.16)

7.98

0.000

0.0

0.649

F

0.32

0.769

GG vs. GA + AA

1.09 (0.84–1.43)

0.64

0.519

88.8

<0.001

R

0.29

0.726

GG vs. AA

1.12 (1.33–1.52)

10.12

0.000

0.0

0.761

F

−0.71

0.526

GA vs. AA

1.13 (1.08–1.18)

5.34

0.000

0.0

0.739

F

1.02

0.384

G vs. A

1.21 (1.16–1.25)

10.03

0.000

22.2

0.273

F

0.66

0.557

rs625039

GG + GA vs. AA

1.07 (1.05–1.09)

7.45

0.000

0.0

0.648

F

0.20

0.850

GG vs. GA + AA

1.30 (1.23–1.37)

9.05

0.000

0.0

0.509

F

1.18

0.303

GG vs. AA

1.17 (1.13–1.21)

9.48

0.000

0.0

0.651

F

0.66

0.545

GA vs. AA

1.09 (1.05–1.12)

4.66

0.000

0.0

0.573

F

−0.35

0.747

G vs. A

1.14 (1.11–1.17)

10.14

0.000

0.0

0.584

F

1.10

0.333

  1. SNP single nucleotide polymorphism; OR odds ratio; CI confidence interval; F fix-effect model; R random-effect model; P het P value for heterogeneity
  2. P < 0.05 stands for statistical significance