Skip to main content

Table 2 Indications for surgery, type of PRF, and method of fixation

From: Survivorship and clinical outcomes of proximal femoral replacement in non-neoplastic primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review

Author (year)

Type of implant

Fixation

No. of previous surgery (range)

Primary Fx (rate)

Periprosthetic Fx (range)

AL (rate)

PJI (rate)

Other

Malkani et al. [17]

Monobloc

N/A

N/A

15 (30%)

3 (6%)

26 (52%)

0 (0%)

6 (12%) [5 Girdlestone, 1 arthrodesis]

Haentjens et al. [18]

(Protek A.G., Berne, CH)

Cemented

(1-6)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

19 (100%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Parvizi et al. [3]

MRS (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ, US)

Cemented

2.7 (0-8)

1 (2%)

20 (42%)

13 (27%)

13 (27%)

0 (0%)

Shih et al. [19]

Custom-made (United Ustar System, Taipei, Taiwan)

Cemented

6.5 (3-22)

0 (0%)

3 (23%)

3 (23%)

9 (70%)

0 (0%)

Schoenfeld et al.[20]

Modular PFR (Howmedica, Allendale, NJ; Biomet, Warsaw, IN, US)

Cemented

N/A

21 (100%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Bertani et al. [21]

JVC-IX (Wright Medical Technology Inc., Arlington, TN, US)

Cemented

N/A

2 (20%)

0 (0%)

8 (80%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Gebert et al. [22]

MUTARS (Implantcast GmbH, Buxtehude, DE)

Cemented (3),

Cementless (42)

N/A

0 (0%)

9 (20%)

19 (42%)

16 (36%)

0 (0%)

Sewell et al. [23]

METS (Stanmore Implants worldwide Ltd, Stanmore, UK)

Cemented (2), Cementless (13)

2.8 (1-4)

0 (0%)

2 (13%)

3 (20%)

9 (60%)

1 (7%) [Painful excision arthroplasty]

Al Taki et al. [4]

MRS (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ, US)

Cemented (33), Cementless (3)

2 (1-5)

0 (0%)

27 (43%)

27 (43%)

7 (13%)

2 (3%) [Instability + bone loss]

McLean et al. [24]

GMRS (Stryker Inc., Mahwah, NJ, US)

Cemented

N/A

4 (20%)

9 (45%)

0 (0%)

7 (35%)

0 (0%)

Dean et al. [25]

METS (Stanmore Implants worldwide Ltd, Stanmore, UK)

N/A

3.1 (1-11)

8 (100%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Colman et al. [26]

Modular Endoprosthetic PFR

N/A

N/A

0 (0%)

21 (100%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Lundh et al. [27]

METS (Stanmore Implants worldwide Ltd, Stanmore, UK)

Cemented (3), Cementless (2)

N/A

0 (0%)

5 (100%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Grammatopoulos et al. [28]

METS (Stanmore Implants worldwide Ltd, Stanmore, UK)

Cemented

2.4 (0-17)

12 (15%)

16 (20%)

6 (8%)

40 (50%)

4 (5%) [Instability + pseudotumor]

Viste et al. [29]

GMRS (Stryker Inc., Mahwah, NJ, US)

Cemented

2 (1-10)

0 (0%)

15 (34%)

16 (36%)

12 (27%)

1 (2%) [Instability]

Fenelon et al. [30]

GMRS (Stryker Inc., Mahwah, NJ, US); LPS (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, US)

N/A

1.4 (0-10)

2 (2.5%)

50 (63%)

9 (11%)

5 (6.3%)

13 (16.4%) [2 Instability, 2 Osteoarthritis, 9 Osteosynthesis failure]

De Martino et al. [43]

GMRS (Stryker Inc., Mahwah, NJ, US)

Cemented (37), Cementless (4)

3.6 (1-11)

0 (0%)

7 (17%)

14 (34%)

17 (42%)

3 (7%) [Nonunion]

Dieckmann et al. [32]

MUTARS (Implantcast GmbH, Buxtehude, DE)

Cemented

2.5

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

49 (100%)

0 (0%)

Total

-

-

3.0 (0-22)

65 (10.3%)

187 (29.7%)

163 (25.9%)

184 (29.3%)

30 (4.8%)

  1. Fx Fracture, N/A Not Available, AL Aseptic Loosening, PJI Periprosthetic Joint Infection