Skip to main content

Table 3 Diagnostic validity of each method for IOLV tears

From: Feasibility of MRI for the evaluation of interosseous ligament vertical segment via subtalar arthroscopy correlation: comparison of 2D and 3D MR images

 

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

Reader 1

Reader 2

Reader 1

Reader 2

Reader 1

Reader 2

Reader 1

Reader 2

1st session

 Method 1

64.0 (16/25)

80.0 (20/25)

44.4 (12/27)

33.3 (9/27)

51.6 (16/31)

55.3 (21/38)

57.1 (12/21)

71.4 (10/14)

 Method 2

60.0 (15/25)

80.0 (20/25)

74.1 (20/27)

77.8 (21/27)

68.2 (15/22)

76.9 (20/26)

66.7 (20/30)

80.8 (21/26)

2nd session

 Method 1

96.0 (24/25)

88.0 (22/25)

29.6 (8/27)

37.0 (10/27)

55.8 (24/43)

56.4 (22/39)

88.9 (8/9)

76.9 (10/13)

 Method 2

72.0 (18/25)

76.0 (19/25)

63.0 (17/27)

70.4 (19/27)

64.3 (18/28)

70.4 (19/27)

70.8 (17/24)

76.0 (19/25)

  1. Note. Data are presented as percentages, with number of patients in parentheses
  2. PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value