Skip to main content

Table 4 Patients features after division of patients in to two groups (A High FOA, B Normal/Low FOA)

From: The role of femoral obliquity angle and T1 pelvic angle in predicting quality of life after spinal surgery in adult spinal deformities

Group A (High FOA) n = 19,

 
 

Mean (+/− SD)

Age

65.3 (+/−5.1)

Sex

F:16, M:3

 

Pre-Operative

Post-Operative (24 months of FU)

P value

FOA

12.2 (+/−0.9)

9.5 (+/−1.7)

0.002

PTA

36.7 (+/− 4.6)

22.7 (+/− 3.2)

0.0054

ODI (%)

56.4 (+/− 7.2)

35.6 (+/− 6.8)

0.0024

SRS 22

3.6 (+/− 0.5)

2.5 (+/− 0.8)

< 0.05

VAS l

8.6 (+/− 1.1)

5.2 (+/− 1.4)

0.007

VAS r

7.2 (+/− 1.0)

4.1 (+/−1.6)

0.005

Biomechanics complications

11 (57.9%)

 

 SL

3 (27.2%)

 

 PJK

4 (36.4%)

 

 RF

4 (36.4%)

 

Revision Surgery rate

7 (36.8%)

 

Group B (Normal/Low FOA) n = 24

 

Mean (+/− SD)

Age

66.7 (+/− 6.3)

Sex

F:18, M: 6

 

Pre-Operative

Post-Operative (24 months of FU)

P value

FOA

8.2 (+/− 0.7)

6.3 (+/− 1.1)

0.023

PTA

25.5 (+/−4.3)

18.4 (+/− 2.2)

0.0001

ODI (%)

43.2 (+/− 4.5)

23.2 (+/− 6.5)

0.0049

SRS 22

2.7 (+/− 0.4)

1.5 (+/− 0.3)

0.0003

VAS l

7.5 (+/−1.1)

2.9 (+/− 0.8)

>  0.0001

VAS r

7.3 (+/− 1.1)

2.8 (+/−0.9)

> 0.0001

Biomechanics complications

2 (8.3%)

 

 SL

1 (50%)

 

 PJK

1 (50%)

 

 RF

_

 

Revision Surgery rate

1 (4.1%)

 
  1. FOA Femoral Obliquity Angle, FU Follow Up, ODI Oswestry Disability Index, SRS-22 Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire, PJK Proximal Junctional Kyphosis, RF Rod Fractures, SD Standard Deviation, SL Screws Loosening, SS Sacral Slope, SVA Sagittal Vertical Axis, TPA T1 Pelvic Angle, VAS Visual Analogue Scale