Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariate analysis between Group D and Group I

From: Postoperative alterations of sagittal cervical alignment and risk factors for cervical kyphosis in 124 Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients

Intergroup Comparison

GROUP D vs. GROUP I

measurement

Pre-op

Post-op

Last follow-up

â–³parameter

MTA

51.7 ± 21.5 vs. 48.5 ± 15.3

15.6 ± 14.9 vs. 14.5 ± 8.7

17.4 ± 13.3 vs. 15.2 ± 10.0

−34.3 ± 15.3 vs. -33.3 ± 15.6

PI

47.0 ± 12.2 vs. 44.5 ± 13.2

44.6 ± 11.5 vs. 42.5 ± 15.4

44.1 ± 10.6 vs. 44.3 ± 15.0

−2.9 ± 6.8 vs. -3.8 ± 14.2

PT

6.1 ± 8.1 vs. 7.5 ± 14.9

7.9 ± 7.8 vs. 9.3 ± 11.8

6.2 ± 6.0 vs. 7.3 ± 12.4

0.1 ± 6.0 vs. -0.8 ± 11.5

SS

40.9 ± 10.6 vs. 39.1 ± 8.0

36.7 ± 9.1 vs. 33.3 ± 8.4

38.0 ± 9.0 vs. 37.1 ± 8.2

−3.0 ± 7.7 vs. -3.0 ± 9.0

LL

−57.0 ± 11.7 vs. -55.5 ± 12.4

−45.3 ± 14.6 vs. -43.6 ± 11.0

−53.6 ± 11.6 vs. -53.0 ± 10.8

3.4 ± 11.0 vs. 2.5 ± 9.3

TK

31.3 ± 20.5 vs. 29.8 ± 16.3

24.4 ± 13.5 vs. 25.8 ± 10.6

26.3 ± 12.1 vs. 30.5 ± 12.4

−5.0 ± 13.4 vs. 0.7 ± 11.2*

PrTK

7.2 ± 9.1 vs. 6.9 ± 9.2

5.1 ± 11.4 vs. 10.2 ± 8.3**

9.8 ± 8.5 vs. 10.1 ± 11.3

2.9 ± 8.8 vs. 3.1 ± 13.0

GTK

39.0 ± 17.6 vs. 30.1 ± 16.9*

26.4 ± 11.1 vs. 30.1 ± 12.1

33.2 ± 11.4 vs. 37.2 ± 13.2

−4.9 ± 11.5 vs. 7.0 ± 10.3***

SVA

−18.6 ± 35.6 vs. -19.0 ± 42.8

17.4 ± 26.0 vs. 9.0 ± 38.1

−17.0 ± 29.7 vs. -13.8 ± 29.2

1.6 ± 39.0 vs. 5.2 ± 44.7

CSVA

22.9 ± 11.7 vs. 20.4 ± 9.6

22.8 ± 11.2 vs. 23.8 ± 10.4

22.6 ± 10.7 vs. 20.2 ± 11.9

−0.3 ± 8.5 vs. -0.2 ± 11.6

T1-slope

21.5 ± 12.5 vs. 13.6 ± 11.3**

17.8 ± 7.6 vs. 19.5 ± 8.4

17. 6 ± 8.0 vs. 21.1 ± 9.4

−2.3 ± 11.2 vs. 8.0 ± 8.4***

CL

−12.0 ± 14.3 vs. 2.6 ± 15.2***

−6.4 ± 13.4 vs. -2.5 ± 11.1

0.0 ± 14.2 vs. -8.5 ± 14.1**

11.0 ± 8.2 vs. -11.0 ± 7.8***

McGS

2.4 ± 9.8 vs. 3.6 ± 7.9

5.9 ± 8.8 vs. 4.8 ± 6.5

10.3 ± 32.9 vs. 2.2 ± 6.7

8.1 ± 33.3 vs. -1.4 ± 7.2

  1. Method: independent t-test, chi-square test. *P < 0.10, **P < 0.05, ***P < 0.01