Table 2 Comparison of the clinical outcomes between the two groups (X ± S or %)
From: 3D printing assisted MIPO for treatment of complex middle-proximal humeral shaft fractures
MIPO Group(n = 21) | ORIF Group(n = 21) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
intraoperative blood loss(ml) | 141.90 ± 37.76 | 261.90 ± 74.00 | 0.000 |
operation time(min) | 89.52 ± 6.69 | 118.10 ± 11.99 | 0.000 |
hospital stay(days) | 4.33 ± 0.66 | 4.67 ± 1.62 | 0.216 |
fracture healing time(weeks) | 13.38 ± 1.43 | 15.06 ± 1.03 | 0.000 |
Complications | |||
radial nerve palsy | 2(9.5%) | 2(9.5%) | / |
bone nonunion | 0 | 4(19.0%) | / |
implant loosening | 0 | 0 | / |
incision infection | 0 | 4(19.0%) | / |
Complications incidence | 9.5% | 47.6% | 0.006 |
QuickDASH score | 15.79 ± 8.80 | 18.17 ± 10.42 | 0.429 |
Constant score | 71.19 ± 10.27 | 69.86 ± 10.36 | 0.678 |
shoulder joint ROM (degrees) | |||
flexion | 136.43 ± 15.26 | 129.29 ± 12.78 | 0.108 |
extension | 43.10 ± 8.87 | 41.19 ± 8.65 | 0.485 |
abduction | 131.43 ± 21.92 | 125.71 ± 13.81 | 0.319 |
external rotation | 58.81 ± 8.50 | 55.48 ± 6.69 | 0.166 |
internal rotation | 44.76 ± 10.18 | 41.67 ± 9.92 | 0.324 |